Kualitas Pelayanan Dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Loyalitas Pelanggan Yang Di Mediasi Oleh Kepuasan Di Bank Muamalat Jombang95
Pengaruh Capital Intensity, Inventory Intensity, Profitabilitas dan Leverage Terhadap Agresivitas Pajak50
PENGARUH EARNING PER SHARE DAN PRICE EARNING RATIO TERHADAP DEBT TO EQUITY RATIO DAN HARGA SAHAM PADA PERUSAHAAN SEKTOR MAKANAN DAN MINUMAN DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA41
About the Journal
Focus and Scope
Eksis : Jurnal Riset Ekonomi dan Bisnis welcomes the original empirical investigation. The manuscripts may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. Subject areas suitable for publication in Eksis: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi dan Bisnis include, but are not limited to the following fields in accounting research:
• Public sector accounting
• Accounting theory
• Financial accounting
• Management accounting
• Behavioral accounting
• marketing Management
• human Resource Management
• operational management
• the economy
Peer Review Process
Every article submitted to this online journal will be peer-reviewed by at least two reviewers using a double-blind review method. Reviewers' comments are then sent to the corresponding author for necessary actions and responses. The suggested decision will be evaluated in an editorial board meeting. Afterward, the editor will send the final decision to the corresponding author.
The journal is published by the scientific paper publishing institution (LP2KI) STIE PGRI Dewantara) biannually, in October - Mach and April - September
Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Eksis: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi dan Bisnis
Eksis: Jurnal riset ekonomi dan bisnis is a biannual peer-reviewed journal published by scientific paper publishing institution (LP2KI) STIE PGRI Dewantara Jombang.
It aims to take part in the advancement of management, accounting, and economic knowledge by publishing high-quality researches on contemporary trends in economics and business in emerging markets/ countries. As the main horizon of the journal is to embrace the contemporary trends in economics and business, hence its scope is dynamic and evolving to accommodate the most recent and emerging issues, challenges, and phenomena. For example, accounting for disasters, big data analytic in business, spiritual capital for management, and sustainability.
We invite industry experts and academic scholars to take a part of our journal’s readers, authors, and reviewers.
Since 2018, Eksis: Jurnal Riset ekonomi dan bisnis has been nationally accredited (Sinta 4) by the Indonesian Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education. The journal is also included in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
Eksis: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi dan Bisnis is a peer-reviewed journal published by the STIE Dewantara Jombang. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of posting an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewers and the publisher. This statement based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication
The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Eksis: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi dan Bisnis is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore essential to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer-reviewer, the publisher and the society.
STIE Dewantara Jombang as publisher of Eksis: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi dan Bisnis takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously, and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or additional commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. Besides, the Faculty of Ushuluddin, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, and the Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and publishers where this is useful and necessary.
The editor of the Wawasan: Jurnal Ilmiah Agama dan Sosial Budaya is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not use in an editor's research without the express written consent of the author.
Duties of Peer-Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer-reviewers assist the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also help the author in improving the paper.
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Any manuscripts received for review must be considered as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorised by the editor.
Standards of Objectivity
Peer-review process should conduct objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Peer-reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument reported should accompany by the appropriate citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer-review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Peer-reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Duties of Authors
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.
Data Access and Retention
Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.
Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original actions and if the authors have used the works, or words of others that this has appropriately cited or quoted.
Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same paper concurrently to more than one journal constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be provided. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the article and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.