KRITIK TERHADA P CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY SEBAGAI STRATEGI KEKUASAAN: SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

  • Lilik Pujiati Institut Teknologi Dan Bisnis PGRI Dewantara Jombang
  • Nur Fadjrih Stiesia Surabaya
  • Wahidahwati Stiesia Surabaya
  • Nur Anisah Institut Teknologi Dan Bisnis PGRI Dewantara Jombang
Abstract views: 30 , PDF downloads: 18
Keywords: CSR, Power, Hegemony, Legitimacy, Capitalism

Abstract

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is widely understood as a form of corporate moral responsibility towards society and the environment. However, from a critical perspective, CSR can be understood not merely as an ethical practice but as an instrument of power that reproduces corporate dominance in the socio-economic order. This conceptual paper aims to examine CSR through a power theory approach, particularly drawing on Michel Foucault's thinking on power relations and discourse, and Antonio Gramsci's on hegemony. The paper's central argument is that CSR functions as a mechanism for legitimizing, normalizing, and depoliticizing structural conflicts between corporations and society. CSR is not merely a practice of philanthropy or regulatory compliance, but rather part of a hegemonic strategy that shapes public perception, manages resistance, and maintains the stability of the global capitalist system. This paper offers a conceptual framework for interpreting CSR as a practice of symbolic and structural power.

References

Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology, 34(1), 51–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920507084623

Banerjee, S. B. (2011). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press.

Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G

Fleming, P., & Jones, M. T. (2013). The end of corporate social responsibility: Crisis and critique. SAGE Publications.

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Pantheon Books.

Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. Pantheon Books.

Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine.

Friends of the Earth. (n.d.). Holding Unilever responsible for its conflict palm oil. Retrieved February 14, 2026, from https://friendsoftheearth.uk/nature/holding-unilever-responsible-its-conflict-palm-oil

Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. International Publishers.

Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action, Vol. 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. Beacon Press.

Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.

Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–437. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9507312924

Kompasiana. (2024). PT Freeport Indonesia: Tantangan dan upaya mengelola isu pencemaran lingkungan di Papua. Retrieved February 14, 2026, from https://www.kompasiana.com/putriregitaa/677d18a0c925c40ac9108cc2/pt-freeport-indonesia-tantangan-dan-upaya-mengelola-isu-pencemaran-lingkungan-di-papua

Levy, D. L. (2008). Political contestation in global production networks. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 943–963. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.34422006

Levy, D. L., & Egan, D. (2003). A neo-Gramscian approach to corporate political strategy. Journal of Management Studies, 40(4), 803–829. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00356

Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.31193458

McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4011987

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and CSR. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.

Reuters. (2025, February 13). Shell should take responsibility for oil spills, Nigerian community leader says. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/shell-should-take-responsibility-oil-spills-nigerian-community-leader-says-2025-02-13/

Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–931. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00950.x

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331

Utting, P. (2005). Rethinking business regulation: From self-regulation to social control. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.

Vogel, D. (2005). The market for virtue: The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Brookings Institution Press.

Windsor, D. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Three key approaches. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00584.x

Žižek, S. (2009). First as tragedy, then as farce. Verso.

PlumX Metrics

Published
2026-04-23