https://ejournal.stiedewantara.ac.id/index.php/JAD/issue/feedJAD : Jurnal Riset Akuntansi & Keuangan Dewantara2026-07-02T10:36:44+07:00Beni Sucipto, SM, MMpublikasi@itebisdewantara.ac.idOpen Journal Systems<p><strong>JAD: Jurnal Akuntansi Dewantara</strong> merupakan terbitan berkala ilmiah sebagai sarana untuk menyebarluaskan hasil penelitian dan ilmu pengetahuan di <strong>bidang Akuntansi dan Keuangan</strong>.</p> <p><strong>JAD: Jurnal Akuntansi Dewantara</strong> diterbitkan oleh Lembaga Penerbitan dan Publikasi Karya Ilmiah (LP2KI) STIE PGRI Dewantara Jombang, secara berkala 2 (dua) kali setahun setiap bulan Januari dan Juli dengan tujuan menyebarluaskan hasil-hasil penelitian, pengkajian, dan pengembangan bidang Akuntansi dan Keuangan</p> <p>Artikel yang di publikasikan dalam JAD: Jurnal Akuntansi Dewantara adalah <strong>artikel hasil penelitian</strong> dari berbagai penulis baik dalam dan luar negeri, dengan melalui review yang ketat oleh para reviewer yang sangat berkompeten di bidangnya dari berbagai perguruan tinggi serta praktisi untuk menjaga kualitas artikel dalam JAD: Jurnal Akuntansi Dewantara</p> <p>Jurnal ini diharapkan mampu memberikan kontribusi atas berbagai permasalahan dan persoalan yang ada pada bidang akuntansi dan keuangan serta mampu mengispirasi, mencerdaskan dan memberi pencerahan </p>https://ejournal.stiedewantara.ac.id/index.php/JAD/article/view/1526Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan, Intensitas Modal, dan Likuiditas Terhadap Tax Avoidance Pada Perusahaan Sektor Teknologi 2026-01-12T12:52:03+07:00Lenni Milandinilennimilandini02@gmail.comPujo Gunarsolennimilandini02@gmail.com<p><em>Tax avoidance is a strategy or method used by companies to avoid or reduce corporate taxes legally. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of ownership structure, capital intensity, and liquidity on tax avoidance in technology sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2022-2024. The quantitative method used was secondary data in the form of company annual reports for the period 2022-2024. Using a purposive sampling method, 13 companies met the established criteria. The results show that ownership structure has no effect on tax avoidance, capital intensity has a negative effect on tax avoidance, and liquidity has no effect on tax avoidance. The conclusion is that institutional shareholders do not prioritize oversight, and the higher the level of fixed asset ownership, the higher the level of tax avoidance. Furthermore, the higher the level of liquidity used for tax avoidance.</em></p>2026-01-12T12:43:35+07:00Copyright (c) 2026 LenniMilandinihttps://ejournal.stiedewantara.ac.id/index.php/JAD/article/view/1535STRATEGI PENCEGAHAN KEGAGALAN TATA KELOLA DI KORPORASI INDONESIA: ANALISIS KUALITATIF MULTI-KASUS2026-07-02T10:36:44+07:00Tri Winarsihtriwinarsih3113@gmail.comNur Fadjrih Asyiknurfadjrih@stiesia.ac.idWahidahwatiwahidahwati@stiesia.ac.id<p>This study aims to analyze patterns of corporate governance failure in Indonesia and<br>formulate contextual and sustainable prevention strategies. The study used a qualitative<br>approach with a comparative case study method (multi-case study). The study population<br>included large corporations in Indonesia that have experienced governance scandals, with a<br>sample of seven cases: TPI, Merpati Nusantara Airlines, Elnusa, Kereta Api Indonesia, Bank<br>Bukopin, Tiga Pilar Sejahtera Food, and Jiwasraya. Data were collected through secondary<br>sources in the form of financial reports, audit reports, court decisions, regulatory reports,<br>credible media, and published interviews. Data analysis was conducted using thematic<br>analysis to identify failure patterns, complemented by process tracing and cross-case<br>synthesis. The results indicate that governance failures are systemic and influenced by weak<br>board independence, owner or political intervention, poor internal control and risk<br>management, limited forensic oversight, and a culture of impunity. This study produces an<br>integrated strategy model for preventing governance failures, encompassing strengthening<br>oversight structures, control mechanisms, ethical culture, and the role of external oversight<br>and regulation.</p>2026-01-22T15:16:41+07:00Copyright (c) 2026 Tri Winarsih Winarsihhttps://ejournal.stiedewantara.ac.id/index.php/JAD/article/view/1490PERAN INSENTIF PAJAK DALAM MENINGKATKAN INVESTASI HIJAU DAN PENURUNAN EMISI KARBON: STUDI EMPIRIS DI INDONESIA2026-01-30T12:50:16+07:00Sri Yaumisriyaumiitbadla@gmail.comRita Nataliawatisriyaumiitbadla@gmail.comMesra Berlyn Hakimsriyaumiitbadla@gmail.comAbdul Majidsriyaumiitbadla@gmail.com<p><em>This study aims to analyze the role of tax incentives in encouraging green investment and reducing carbon emissions in Indonesia. The study used a descriptive qualitative approach with a systematic literature review design. Secondary data sources included green fiscal policies, official government reports, and reputable journal articles related to tax incentives, green investment, and carbon emissions from 2014–2024. The study's results indicate that since the strengthening of the green fiscal framework through the 2021 HPP Law, Presidential Regulation No. 98 of 2021 concerning the Economic Value of Carbon, and various PMKs on tax incentives, the value of green investment has increased by an average of around 21% per year, particularly in the renewable energy, low-carbon manufacturing, electric vehicles, and waste management sectors. National carbon emissions showed a moderate downward trend and a cumulative reduction of approximately 9.8 million tons of CO₂e in the 2020–2023 period. These findings confirm that tax incentives play a significant role as a fiscal instrument to accelerate the transition to a low-carbon economy.</em></p>2026-01-30T11:16:54+07:00Copyright (c) 2026 Sri Yaumihttps://ejournal.stiedewantara.ac.id/index.php/JAD/article/view/1607DAMPAK PENERAPAN PERILAKU BIAYA TERHADAP LABA DAN KEPUTUSAN MANAJERIAL PERUSAHAAN: SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW 2026-04-24T19:37:18+07:00Zhafirah Thalia Carissazhafirah031@gmail.comHanin Muthi'ah Nurarfani01031282429135@student.unsri.ac.idSiti Mei Rahmawatisitimeirahmawati450@gmail.comMona Asifa Syariahmonaasifah@gmail.comRifani Akbar Sulbahririfaniakbar@unsri.ac.id<p>Through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach, this study examines the factors that influence company profits when viewed from the concept of cost behavior and its influence on managerial decisions. The study was carried out by examining a range of scientific articles through several systematic stages, including identification, screening, eligibility evaluation, and the selection of relevant studies. The study found that corporate profits are influenced by cost structure, activity level, sales volume, selling price, and operational efficiency. Cost behavior analysis serves as a basis for management in planning strategies to increase profits and maintain stable company performance.</p> <p> </p>2026-04-17T11:42:33+07:00Copyright (c) 2026 Zhafirah Thalia Carissa, Zhafirah Thalia Carissa, Hanin Muthi'ah Nurarfani, Siti Mei Rahmawati, Mona Asifa Syariah, Rifani Akbar Sulbahrihttps://ejournal.stiedewantara.ac.id/index.php/JAD/article/view/1566KRITIK TERHADA P CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY SEBAGAI STRATEGI KEKUASAAN: SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW2026-04-23T13:40:17+07:00Lilik Pujiatililik_pujiati@itebisdewantara.ac.idNur Fadjrihnurfadjrih@stiesia.ac.idWahidahwatiwahidahwati@stiesia.ac.idNur Anisahnur_anisah@itebisdewantara.ac.id<p>Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is widely understood as a form of corporate moral responsibility towards society and the environment. However, from a critical perspective, CSR can be understood not merely as an ethical practice but as an instrument of power that reproduces corporate dominance in the socio-economic order. This conceptual paper aims to examine CSR through a power theory approach, particularly drawing on Michel Foucault's thinking on power relations and discourse, and Antonio Gramsci's on hegemony. The paper's central argument is that CSR functions as a mechanism for legitimizing, normalizing, and depoliticizing structural conflicts between corporations and society. CSR is not merely a practice of philanthropy or regulatory compliance, but rather part of a hegemonic strategy that shapes public perception, manages resistance, and maintains the stability of the global capitalist system. This paper offers a conceptual framework for interpreting CSR as a practice of symbolic and structural power.</p>2026-04-23T13:39:53+07:00Copyright (c) 2026 Lilik Pujiati, Nur Fadjrih, Wahidahwati, Nur Anisah